I joined ShoeDazzle.com back in May, and have yet to place an order. There are 2 reasons for this and most of them came to me well before the rumors of a Kardashian sweat shop in China and child labor cropped up.
First, consider the $39.95 price. After over six months of reviewing a variety of styles, most of the shoe materials are “man-made.” When photos of products are enlarged to view them better, the quality of the workmanship appears to be comparable to a $24.95 pair of shoes from Payless.
Second, many of the heels are either incredibly high or incredibly frumpy. It’s not that I’m such an “old lady” that I don’t wear high-heeled platforms. In fact, I have several pairs of well-made, high quality platform shoes with 4.5 inch heels. I’m not about to risk my ankles to a pair of high, high heels when the surface workmanship doesn’t appear to be all that stellar. And order a lower heeled shoe? Have you seen them? Many of the lower-heel styles look like they came from the back of my closet–in the 1980s. I will make an exception for the flats, some of which are rather cute, but the site does not offer a view of the interior of the shoes. With flats, I like to see how they are stitched and what the insoles looks like. I may, however, take a chance with a pair of flats.
Third, many of the styles are downright ugly or appear more than once under different names. Just look at Rika and Mayci. Same shoe, different material. 
I’m less than impressed…..
As for other products on the ShoeDazzle.com site, well, the one purse that I thought I might like to order, a small evening bag with a skull clasp that resembled this Alexander McQueen skull clasp bag sold out in no time flat. All the other styles of bags and jewelry have left me feeling, well, kind of flat. Not anything I would necessarily carry nor wear.
Bottom line: I’m not all that thrilled with ShoeDazzle.com, and my expectations for its products are not real high. That being the case, perhaps I won’t be too disappointed. Except perhaps by the price.